Update #12.5: Paris filtered through Diana

So, in Paris I kind of fell in love. Her name is Diana.


The Diana is a type of camera with a plastic body. It’s feather-weight and uses 120 medium format film. It was originally designed as a cheap novelty item, the kind of thing sold for 99 cents a piece, but was abandoned and like with many toy cameras with wonky results, a cult following developed.

The day we decided to explore Montmartre, we stopped in at the Paris Lomography store and on impulse I purchased one. For all intents and purposes, the Diana is a crappy camera. It has light leaks, a cheap body and lens. Some might say that I could simply download an Iphone app to get the same quality of photos. But there’s a difference, and even if it’s a stubborn, misguided insistence on my part, so be it.

Jardins Luxembourg

I have a Holga, which is the same concept (plastic body, cheap, medium format), but I’ve been frustrated with it since my first roll of film. It was a little too fussy for me and I got very few usable shots out of it. It’s currently sitting up on a shelf in the apartment in Montreal.

With the Diana, on the other hand, I was extremely pleased with the quality of the photos. They’re grainy and the light is wobbly and sometimes things look strangely flattened out, like I’m looking at a cardboard cut-out of the Sacre Coeur rather than the real thing. I like it. I like the dreaminess, I like the feelings these photos evoke.

Sacre Coeur

There’s been a lot of photography related activity in this household this summer. Andrew takes photos every day here in Athens. He’s also been reading many books about it, and I end up flipping through them as well. The Ongoing Moment by Geoff Dyer is a brilliant discussion of photography and literature, on considering photography as a continuous conversation, one where similar themes and images are repurposed and reinterpreted over the years. I read Susan Sontag’s classic On Photography. I’ve examined the photos of  Robert Frank’s’ The Americans, started looking at the images once published in Steiglitz’s classic Camera Work magazine, and seen so many photography exhibits at different museums in Athens, Paris, Berlin.

Bar a chiens

I love taking photographs, but the truth is that I’m satisfied with my little point and shoot. I don’t need fancy lenses, I don’t need to play with settings. The digital photos I take turn out crisp, the resolution is good, and the camera’s small enough that I can take it with me wherever I go. I’m more interested in the memories I’m capturing – I like taking pictures of my friends, of the details of places I’ve been to.

Store window

Most of my artistic impulses are focused on writing, but I still get the urge to make something more visual from time to time. I decided on collages back in May, picked out the perfect hardcover notebook to paste them in and started saving little scraps of papers. It didn’t work out as planned: the notebook has one collage in it, but is fat with random papers I’ve stuck in it to use for future collages. I’ve saved too much, but it will all probably be discarded if I don’t figure out a way to use them soon.

Somewhere in Montmartre

Now that I’ve seen the results of my first rolls from the Diana, I’m glad I have this little camera. It will do the trick for awhile.

(The rest of the photos are here.)

12 thoughts on “Update #12.5: Paris filtered through Diana

  1. Teri, I love these! I know I’ve already said that on Flickr & Twitter, but I’m just being thorough. And thanks for the Diana/Holga comparison. I have been slightly disappointed with my Holga but now I’m inspired to try a Diana.

  2. Amanda – that’s exactly it, they’re more like visual representations of memories. A Holga for your wedding is perfect. Many of my favourite photos from our wedding last year were Polaroids.

    Jen – Thank you!! I don’t know why the Diana produces better pictures for me than the Holga, but the end result is more consistent with what I see in the viewfinder and is less sensitive to light. You can apparently buy Diana clones for much cheaper online, but I didn’t want to wait :/

  3. Dear dear dear..those pictures are so romantic.And spooky and mysterious and beautiful.Diana is a must to illustrate your stories

    I love the one of the dog ( of course ! I hear you say !)
    The one of Andrew is awesome..full of atmosphere. :-)


  4. Thanks, guys! I’m glad I’m not the only one who likes these wonky photos.

    Nel, I knew you’d like the dog photo! The funny thing is that the dog is FAKE. It’s made of fibreglass, but the Diana smooths out the edges and makes it look like a real dog.

  5. Pingback: Montreal Gazette review « Bibliographic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>